It can refer to an opinion that differs from an official or popularly held one. To dissent is to voice such an opinion.
- S.O.E.: An outline history of the special operations executive 1940 - 46?
- Bioactives in Fruit: Health Benefits and Functional Foods?
- House approves $4.5bn border crisis spending bill – as it happened.
There are shades of meaning, but it always means to go against the grain:. Putin, who has rarely faced public dissent in his 11 years in power, appeared momentarily taken aback, but quickly recovered and finished his statement.
- TOKYO (10 a.m.).
- Complainant has right to know about dissent in Election Commission decisions, say former CECs.
- All-rounder Carlos Brathwaite reprimanded for showing dissent to umpire's decision.
New York Times. To recap: decent is fine and you're dressed, descent is to go down down down, and dissent is when your opinion doesn't mesh with others.
The adjective decent means sufficient or acceptable. The local diner you like to frequent may not serve a four-star breakfast, but it probably has decent food. Continue reading To dissent is to publicly disagree with an official opinion or decision.
Dissent is also a noun referring to public disagreement. Whether you're a student, an educator, or a lifelong learner, Vocabulary. Don't have an account yet?
Elena Kagan issues scathing dissent knocking 'tragically wrong' gerrymandering decision | TheHill
Roberts and Scalia also filed separate concurring opinions, while Thomas filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. Federal Election Commission. Info Print Print. Table Of Contents. Submit Feedback.
Thank you for your feedback. Introduction Background Majority opinion Dissenting opinion. Written By: Brian Duignan.
Start Your Free Trial Today. Load Next Page.
Dred Scott v. Sandford/Dissent Curtis
More About. Oyez - Citizens United v. And in turn, the State and all its organs have to respect such an exercise of rights. This is especially so of the judiciary, which is duty-bound to uphold constitutional principles. This muzzling of voices and curbing of dissent is only going to push citizens of this country to the wall.
To forestall such dangers, there should be a clear acknowledgement of basics by the judicial establishment: Even if the accused is the highest arbiter of justice, no one is above the law. The iron fist approach to dissent makes it worse.